Why Baristas Always Recommend Hot Pour-Over Coffee (And How It Affects Flavor)

 If you often visit coffee shops for pour-over coffee and ask the barista whether a certain bean tastes better hot or iced, chances are they’ll recommend the hot version. Just yesterday, a friend buying beans complained about this and asked me, “Why do pour-overs have to be hot?”

To be fair, the reason baristas recommend hot pour-overs isn’t because hot brews necessarily taste better than iced ones. As I’ve always emphasized, compared to iced pour-overs, hot pour-overs allow you to taste a more complete expression of a coffee’s flavors.

Why does a hot pour-over offer more complete flavor?

Most coffee shops — including mine — make iced pour-over using a flash-chill method. This means lowering the temperature by adding ice directly into the coffee so you can quickly get a cold cup of pour-over.

But since the ice melts while cooling the coffee, the overall concentration inevitably becomes diluted. If we don’t want to end up with a watery cup, we need to increase the coffee concentration to offset that dilution. However, this method comes with a drawback:
To raise concentration, we must reduce the amount of brewing water.

For example, when I brew 15 g of coffee, I use 225 ml of water for hot pour-over but only 150 ml for iced. This significant reduction in water lowers extraction efficiency. And when extraction efficiency drops, fewer flavor compounds dissolve from the coffee grounds. Naturally, this means you won’t get a full flavor profile from your iced pour-over.

So it’s not that iced pour-over tastes bad — it’s simply less suitable when your goal is to fully experience the flavors of a coffee.

How big is the flavor difference between hot and iced?

Here’s a comparison I often make. I’ll brew two pots of coffee with their respective parameters: one hot, one iced. Then, for the iced brew, I replace the ice with hot water so that the final liquid volume equals the hot brew without lowering the temperature. This allows both brews to be tasted at the same temperature, making their aromatic differences easier to perceive.

For this test, I used the Ethiopia Gesha “Flower Queen” from our menu — a popular choice that many people can relate to.

Here are the parameters I used:

Hot Pour-Over

  • 15 g coffee

  • EK43 at 10

  • Water temperature: 92°C

  • Ratio: 1:15 (15 g coffee, 225 ml water)

  • Brew time: ~2 minutes

Iced Pour-Over

  • 15 g coffee

  • EK43 at 9.5

  • Water temperature: 92°C

  • Ratio: 1:10 (15 g coffee, 150 ml water)

  • Coffee-to-ice ratio: 1:6

  • Ice replaced with 70°C hot water for the comparison test

  • Brew time: ~2 minutes

Skipping the brewing process—here are the results:

Hot Brew Results

The extraction yield measured at 20.5%.
The aroma is rich with berry notes.
Flavor notes include citrus, strawberry, pineapple, cream, blueberry, and a hint of florals.
The overall texture is smooth and full-bodied, with a long-lasting finish.

Iced Brew Results

The extraction yield measured at 18.6%.
The aroma is noticeably lighter, both on the nose and on the palate.
You can taste citrus, mixed berries, and a subtle floral hint.
The finish is shorter, but overall, it’s still a pleasant cup.

I also offered the two brews as samples for customers choosing beans in the shop. Unsurprisingly, everyone agreed that the hot pour-over had a more expressive aroma.

This shows that the flavor and aroma gap between hot and iced pour-over is indeed real. Therefore, if your goal is to experience the full flavor profile of a coffee, hot pour-over is usually the better choice.

Can we adjust iced-pour-over parameters to achieve fuller flavor?

Some of you might be wondering: based on my previous brewing guides, can’t we adjust extraction parameters to increase extraction yield and achieve a fuller iced pour-over?

Technically, yes.
Using finer grind size, extending brew time, or raising water temperature can all increase extraction efficiency.

But the downside is obvious: it greatly increases the risk of over-extraction, which introduces bitterness and off-flavors and makes the coffee unpleasant to drink.

This is why most coffee shops keep their iced-pour-over parameters “moderate”:

  • Reduce the total water

  • Add ice

  • Adjust the remaining parameters just enough to avoid over-extraction

While there are alternative methods, most shops don’t prefer them because they either cost more time or require more materials. So the current iced-pour-over method is simply the most practical approach.

Final Thoughts

As mentioned earlier, iced pour-over isn’t bad at all — it just doesn’t present the full flavor spectrum as well as hot pour-over. So if your goal is to truly explore the complete flavor experience of a coffee, the hot method is still the more suitable choice.

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Guangxi Coffee Explained: China’s Emerging High-Altitude Coffee Origin Beyond Yunnan

图片
 Not long ago, while scrolling through Weibo, I came across a post saying that Guangxi has started growing its own coffee . That immediately caught my attention and genuinely surprised me. Curious, I decided to dig deeper and share what I found with you. From a coffee perspective, China is actually a rather unique country. It has a complete coffee supply chain —from cultivation and roasting to distribution and consumption. China is both a coffee-producing nation and a coffee-consuming one. When people talk about Chinese coffee, Yunnan naturally comes to mind as the most well-known producing region. Over the past few years, we’ve all witnessed the remarkable transformation of Yunnan coffee. It has moved from being primarily bulk-purchased for instant coffee to embracing a mature specialty coffee path. Today, even traditionally processed Yunnan Catimor can offer a clean and pleasant cup profile, and varieties like Yunnan Geisha have also emerged, bringing greater diversity. These...
阅读全文

Why Water Quality Matters in Pour-Over Coffee (Alkalinity, Hardness & Flavor Explained)

图片
 The coffee we drink is, at its core, water that has dissolved the flavorful compounds inside coffee grounds. In fact, more than 98% of a cup of pour-over coffee is water. We spend so much time chasing the best origins and growing regions, the most suitable processing methods, the perfect roast profiles, and the most precise brewing techniques—yet all of these efforts ultimately rely on water to carry the coffee’s flavor. If we overlook the foundational role of water, everything else can easily fall apart. **No.1 Water Plays Two Core Roles in Coffee Brewing: Extraction and Flavor** Water is responsible for extracting soluble flavor compounds from coffee grounds, and it also makes up the body of the final beverage itself. The chemical composition of the water directly influences what ends up in your cup. **No.2 The Soluble Compounds in Water: Alkalinity and Hardness** Water contains both negatively charged ions and positively charged ions. The concentration of negatively ...
阅读全文

Would You Drink Coffee Made from Food Waste? The Rise of Beanless Coffee Explained

图片
 Every single second, the world consumes about 26,000 cups of coffee . On Shanghai’s Huaihai Road alone—less than two kilometers long—you can find nearly 50 cafés , each with its own style. Coffee has long since become a nationwide obsession. Enthusiasts eagerly debate bean origins, processing methods, and flavor notes, yet few stop to ask a deeper question: What hidden burden does this beloved drink place on the planet? From a food-industry carbon-emissions perspective, coffee ranks just behind beef, lamb, cheese, and chocolate . Data shows that producing a single cup of coffee consumes roughly 140 liters of water , while growing and processing one kilogram of coffee beans generates about 17 kilograms of CO₂ . Viewed through the lens of Western environmental narratives, this kind of data practically screams: ban it . How could such an “unethical” product escape scrutiny in one of the world’s environmental flag-bearers—the UK? British research has already sounded the alarm: by 20...
阅读全文